| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 |
21. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: retro mike on 01/04/2009 13:56:06 Ah so the truth comes out with CCP's proposal to buff Black Ops: Quote: For now, we have been able to allow covert cynosural fields to be activated in cynojammed systems so a covert ops flee...
- by retro mike - at 2009.04.01 13:54:00
|
22. The new bomber should be introduced as a new ship not replace the old - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Totally agree with OP
- by retro mike - at 2009.04.01 10:10:00
|
23. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: retro mike on 01/04/2009 08:03:48 Originally by: HEPBHOE OKOH4AHUE Edited by: HEPBHOE OKOH4AHUE on 01/04/2009 00:15:49 I vote to leave bombers as is, except modifying explosion radius bonus for cruise missiles to 19,5% ...
- by retro mike - at 2009.04.01 08:02:00
|
24. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Defeated Originally by: yani dumyat I like your new ship Chronotis but please can we have 2 ships instead. You'd be our hero and you wouldn't get eaten by sharks Two bomber types would indeed be pure win. May...
- by retro mike - at 2009.04.01 06:24:00
|
25. [Proposal] Fire out CCP game designers "rebalancing" Stealth Bombers. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Ephemeron this is not nearly as bad as the Nanonerf. It's like comparing Madrid bombings to the Holocaust 1000 times worse, and the people just stood and watched. I can't forgive the people responsible for that atrocity aga...
- by retro mike - at 2009.04.01 06:20:00
|
26. PROPOSAL FOR A MEMORIAL TO THE OLD STEALTH BOMBER IN JITA - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Seeing as CCP Chronotis and his motley crew have already decided on the demise of the cruise bomber, I think it only fitting that a memorial is placed right outside the main staion in Jita to remind us of this sad date. Outragous perhaps? Even si...
- by retro mike - at 2009.03.31 23:34:00
|
27. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP Chronotis you have already said what we think doesnt matter. SO YOU THINKS ITS FUNNY? WHO THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU ARE? CCP Chronotis, We both know why you failed to fix cruise explosion velocity to Stealth Bombers after the missile nerf...
- by retro mike - at 2009.03.31 23:22:00
|
28. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Marlenus in a context where CCP appears to be generally trying to reduce encounter ranges (my guess is because of the speed changes from QR). I always engaged my targets a maximum of 40k away. Quote: I liked t...
- by retro mike - at 2009.03.31 14:59:00
|
29. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Chronotis comments on keeping the stealth bomber in its current role CCP Chronotis It is understandable that those of you who have found a good niche and strategy for the stealth bombers and sniping have met with so...
- by retro mike - at 2009.03.31 14:37:00
|
30. Dont stifle free speech by locking my manticore thread CCP - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I appreciate the comments you make and agree entirely that normally this would be the way of dealing with it. I think I am right in thinking that the tinkering of a ship class to this extent is unprecedented in eve. And It is pretty much certain ...
- by retro mike - at 2009.03.31 09:41:00
|
31. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Gner Dechast Edited by: Gner Dechast on 31/03/2009 09:16:01 Originally by: Artemis Dragmire I still think torp based SBs sound awesome. I haven't run the numbers but a small gang of these could be quite a frigh...
- by retro mike - at 2009.03.31 09:22:00
|
32. Dont stifle free speech by locking my manticore thread CCP - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Conspiracy? No. Ability of ccp to listen to the majority of pilots? None New torp firing destroyer bomber class? Yes
- by retro mike - at 2009.03.31 09:13:00
|
33. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: The Merc well, i am a bomber pilot and have been for a loong time. thank you for messing with my skill training. you realy make it a fun game to play when we work hard for something and when we archive our goal, u take it a...
- by retro mike - at 2009.03.31 08:40:00
|
34. Dont stifle free speech by locking my manticore thread CCP - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: retro mike on 31/03/2009 08:19:46 Ah so you locked my manticore thread (CCP GIVE BOMBERS BACK THEIR OLD ROLE) and tell us to continue discussion in sticky so our complaints would be lost in the mass of pages. Well I am afraid yo...
- by retro mike - at 2009.03.31 08:17:00
|
35. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: retro mike on 31/03/2009 08:04:50 Yes, I can imagine CCP Chronotis as a kid. Nobody was allowed to play with his train set apart from him. Whats the point of leaving feedback if you dont listen. There was nothing wrong with the ...
- by retro mike - at 2009.03.31 08:04:00
|
36. Boost stagnating regions of empire - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ive not seen any quiet areas, give some examples?
- by retro mike - at 2009.03.30 07:56:00
|
37. Stealth Bombers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Someone at CCP is determined to force siege launchers onto bombers. Dont change its role just fix what you broke in the first place . Give bombers a boost to explosion velocity per level for Cruise Missiles so they work again. I trained age...
- by retro mike - at 2009.03.27 09:37:00
|
38. CCP: While you're in an ECM nerfing mood... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
So youre whinging cos you because the enemy ship countered you by using ECM drones. You were outmanouvered. Get over it and move on.
- by retro mike - at 2009.03.26 09:38:00
|
39. Stealth Bombers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Thenoran Originally by: retro mike Easy-To-Follow 3-steps to Make Torp Bomber Viable!!!!! 1. +12.5% damage and -50% rof. 3. 3 siege slots and a seperate bomb launcher. 3. Fix Bombs! Grz Y...
- by retro mike - at 2009.03.25 13:57:00
|
40. Stealth Bombers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Easy-To-Follow 3-steps to Make Torp Bomber Viable!!!!! 1. +12.5% damage and -50% rof. 3. 3 siege slots and a seperate bomb launcher. 3. Fix Bombs! Grz
- by retro mike - at 2009.03.25 10:19:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |